The upcoming legislative session will see a push among some lawmakers to change the way Vermonters cast their ballots during elections.

Legislators in the House and Senate plan on introducing bills that would institute a ranked-choice voting system in Vermont.

Under a ranked-choice system, voters rank candidates in order of preference. If no candidate is selected as the top preference by at least 50 percent of voters, then the ranked-choice system comes into play.

In this no-majority scenario, the candidate with the fewest first-choice votes is eliminated. The second-choice selections on the ballots are then distributed to the remaining contenders. This process is repeated until a candidate secures a majority of the vote.

Champions of ranked-choice voting argue that the system leads to a more accurate reflection of public opinion in election results, by requiring winners to receive the majority of voter support or face a “runoff.”

“It just kind of tallies the will of the people much more accurately than the current system we have because it allows people to really make a statement about every candidate,” Rep. Laura Sibilia said of ranked-choice voting.

Sibilia, an independent from Dover, Vt., plans on spearheading an effort in the House to pass a ranked-choice bill into law. Sen. Chris Pearson, D/P-Chittenden, also plans to introduce a ranked-choice bill in the Senate.

The system could improve voter engagement and the tenor of political campaigns in Vermont, Sibilia says.

Under a ranked-choice system, candidates in a crowded field compete not only for first-choice votes, but also for second- and third-place rankings.

The weight of broader appeal would make it harder for candidates to use “generalized sound bites” and “partisan talking points” in campaigns, according to Sibilia.

“It requires the candidates to behave seriously,” she said. “You can’t turn the voters off too much. You’ve got to watch yourself.”

Pearson said a ranked-choice system would allow candidates to focus more on issues and less on party affiliation, particularly among candidates outside the two major parties.

“Candidates who are running as an independent spend a lot of time explaining how they are interested in operating outside of the two-party system,” he said. “I think that voters and candidates would rather talk about health care and climate change and property taxes.”

Maine is the only state with a ranked-choice system, which was approved by voters in a 2016 referendum. Several municipalities across the country including San Francisco; Minneapolis; and Cambridge, Mass., also use ranked-choice systems.

In 2007, the Legislature passed a bill that would have established ranked-choice voting in Vermont congressional races. However, then-governor Jim Douglas, a Republican, vetoed the measure.

Between 2006 and 2010, Burlington used a ranked-choice system known as instant-runoff voting. It was repealed by voters in 2010, after Bob Kiss, a Progressive, was re-elected as mayor in 2009.

Kiss won the five-way race without receiving the highest number of first-preference ballots as the ranked-choice process eliminated other candidates from the race.

Kurt Wright, a former Republican representative who now is the Burlington City Council president, received the most first-preference ballots — about 33 percent of those cast — while Kiss received only about 29 percent.

But because Wright didn’t have a majority in the first round, Kiss was able to close in and win the race after two other candidates were eliminated. After Kiss’s election, there was a successful push to overturn instant-runoff voting in 2010.

“I think people just saw the result,” Wright said. “They saw, ‘Wow, a candidate that gets the most traditional votes can not end up winning in this system.’ ”

Sibilia said it’s possible that the Legislature could pass the bill within two years, but she said there’s a fair amount of voter education about ranked-choice that should take place before it becomes law.