Pittsburgh Penguins goalie Matt Murray follows the puck into his glove during hockey practice at the team training center in Cranberry, Pa., Butler county, on Friday, June 2, 2017. The Penguins are scheduled to play the Nashville Predators in the third game of NHL Stanley Cup Finals in Nashville on Saturday. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)
Pittsburgh Penguins goalie Matt Murray follows the puck into his glove during hockey practice at the team training center in Cranberry, Pa., Butler county, on Friday, June 2, 2017. The Penguins are scheduled to play the Nashville Predators in the third game of NHL Stanley Cup Finals in Nashville on Saturday. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)

Through two games of the Stanley Cup Final, the Pittsburgh Penguins have been badly outshot, lost the majority of faceoffs and had the puck far less than the Nashville Predators.

Yet, they lead the series, 2-1, following a familiar script.

The Penguins frustrated the Columbus Blue Jackets, Washington Capitals and Ottawa Senators with this unconventional method of winning. Theyโ€™re doing it again, needing just two more victories to win back-to-back championships.

The Penguins scored three goals in a span of 3:08 in the third period of Game 2. Pittsburgh won despite a 37-minute shot drought in Game 1.

โ€œItโ€™s amazing,โ€ Capitals general manager Brian MacLellan said. โ€œYouโ€™ve got to give Pittsburgh some credit here because they keep doing it. They get outplayed for long stretches, and then they counterattack and then they execute on the counterattack. They make the best of their scoring opportunities, and it seems to be a consistent pattern.โ€

Itโ€™s a winning pattern that that could make Pittsburgh just the third team since the start of the salary-cap era in 2006 to be outshot and win the Cup, following the 2011 Boston Bruins and 2015 Chicago Blackhawks.

The Penguins lost 44 of 77 faceoffs in Game 2 to fall under 50 percent for the series at 66-68. Theyโ€™ve allowed 64 shots and taken 39 and been out-attempted 86-57 at 5-on-5 and were 1-of-10 on the power play entering Saturday nightโ€™s Game 3 in Tennessee.

Nashville has controlled the play so far with nothing to show for it.

โ€œWe canโ€™t just look at the numbers and say, โ€˜Yeah, weโ€™re winning all the numbers but the scoreboard,โ€™ โ€ Nashville coach Peter Laviolette said Thursday. โ€œThereโ€™s got to be things we got to do better.โ€

The Penguins are already 9-6 in these playoffs when outshot by an opponent, in part because theyโ€™re scoring on a league-best 10.9 percent of their shots, which if it stands would be second-best among champions in the cap era behind only the 2010 Blackhawks.

That kind of shooting success is difficult to sustain over 82 games but not impossible considering the firepower the Penguins have in Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin and Phil Kessel.

โ€œThey got three superstars on that team,โ€ Senators coach Guy Boucher said. โ€œAt some point or another, theyโ€™re going to get their looks. Itโ€™s really tough to defend against that.โ€

Itโ€™s even tougher when the goaltending canโ€™t match up. Pittsburghโ€™s Marc-Andre Fleury and Matt Murray have combined for a .930 save percentage as Columbusโ€™ Sergei Bobrovsky put up an .882, Washingtonโ€™s Braden Holtby a .778 and Nashvilleโ€™s Pekka Rinne a .778 of his own through two games.

You canโ€™t blame Ottawaโ€™s Craig Anderson and his .936 save percentage for not knocking out the Penguins, but there are plenty of other reasons the defending champs are still standing.

Early in the first round, Columbus players called Penguins goals โ€œluckyโ€ and โ€œflukyโ€ and insisted everything would be all right if they continued to play their game. At one point, captain Nick Foligno said: โ€œThereโ€™s so much good that weโ€™re doing that itโ€™s going to break for us eventually.โ€

Sound familiar, Nashville? It didnโ€™t ever break for the Blue Jackets and they were ousted in five games despite putting 23 more shots on net than the Penguins. Thereโ€™s a reason Pittsburgh coach Mike Sullivan stresses a โ€œcounterattack mentality.โ€

Given the Capitalsโ€™ 61-45 shot advantage through two games, Jay Beagle was asked if he was worried that his teammates sounded an awful lot like the Blue Jackets. Yeah, maybe.

โ€œYou can feel like youโ€™re dominating them a little bit, dominating play in their zone a lot, and they strike,โ€ Beagle said. โ€œTheyโ€™re really good at obviously capitalizing on their opportunities.โ€

Much like P.K. Subban said after the Predatorsโ€™ Game 2 Cup Final loss that they played well for all but about three crucial minutes, the Capitals tried to fend off similar frustration when seemingly every odd-man rush against was turning into a Penguins goal.

โ€œItโ€™s easy to get frustrated when you feel like you played (better),โ€ said Brooks Orpik, who won the Cup with Pittsburgh in 2009. โ€œWhether you outplay a team for 55 minutes and you still have nothing to show for it, I think youโ€™ve just got to just have belief in what youโ€™re doing that over the course of 60 minutes or over time that eventually youโ€™re going to get the result that you want.โ€

After coming back to force a Game 7 and losing on home ice, the Capitals came away from the series believing they were the better team but were outplayed. The Predators are similarly talking now about the Penguinsโ€™ fortunes on bounces but are trying not to fall into the same trap.

โ€œThe chances that weโ€™ve given up are low; the shot opportunities weโ€™ve given up are low,โ€ Laviolette said. โ€œBut yet weโ€™re finding ones that I think we can clean up and help take care of some of the situations that weโ€™re leaving against an opportunistic team.โ€

Every opponent can agree: Opportunistic is the best way to describe these Penguins.